Vital Spark wrote:From what I've read the prognosis wasn't good, and he managed to hang on to life much longer than anyone expected.
Mr.P: Of course an unhealthy diet and smoking isn't good for anyone, but quite honestly if you've been diagnosed with an incurable disease, you're not going to give up the things that may make your life just that little bit more bearable.
VS.
I knew I'd be in trouble if I dared say anything.

However, the same criticism was all over the media, so hardly a contrary view.
Sometimes stopping smoking can cause more stress than continuing but it would take some persuading to convince me that continuing to smoke is worth the 'hell on wheels' (as Patrick put it) of chemotherapy. The first time those toxic chemicals hit my bloodstream the fags would be out the window.
There is not one smoker in the hospital ward which deals with smoking related diseases who doesn’t regret the day that they lit up their first cigarette and who doesn’t regret the fact that they did not give up before they got sick.
Maybe it had something to do with false hope over a new experimental drug called 'Vatalanib'. Or, as you suggest, deep down he felt there was no real prospect, so why bother? Or he was simply chronically addicted.
If it was me I would give this protocol a go, rather than go the chemo route...
http://www.curenaturalicancro.com/proto ... ancer.html
No offence intended.

"Let no one who has the slightest desire to live in peace and quietness be tempted, under any circumstances, to enter upon the chivalrous task of trying to correct a popular error."---William Thoms