Another crackdown on border runners

Visa questions, companies, work permits, employment, insurance, banking and finance, and legal issues.
Post Reply
User avatar
Super Joe
Rock Star
Rock Star
Posts: 4929
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 1:43 pm

Post by Super Joe »

hogus wrote:SJ, seems you haven't done your research!
Where it's written that you must leave all your invested money in the country for you duration????
Here it is Hogus, right there in front of you in the Philippine link YOU provided:

Q: HOW LONG IS THE VISA VALID?
A: The SRRV is valid for so long as one remains a member of good standing of the Program and provided his time deposit and/or investment exists in the Philippines.

==============================================
Cancellation of the SRR Visa:
Retirees should provide a written notice to the PRA within 30 days prior to his/her cancellation of the SRR Visa

==============================================
Non-Withdrawability of Retiree’s Deposit – The Retiree’s deposit or account shall not be withdrawn by the retiree for the duration of his participation in the Program and the depository bank shall not allow such withdrawal except upon proper notice or approval by the PRA.
==============================================




==============================================
Blimey, looking at the Malaysian one it's only for the wealthy and appears you can only use half your money invested and that in Malaysia. Cr@p

Aged Below 50 years old
1) Open a fixed deposit account of RM300,000.00 (85,000 USD)
2) After a period of one year, the participant can withdraw up to RM150,000.00 for approved expenses relating to house purchase, education for children in Malaysia and medical purposes.
3) Must maintain a minimum balance of RM150,000.00 (42,500 USD) from second year onwards and throughout stay in Malaysia under this programme.


Yeah Thailand's a right rip off hey :roll:

SJ
hogus
Professional
Professional
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 6:34 pm
Location: Hua Hin

Post by hogus »

So, SJ, you really think it's more comfortable in TH to show 40,000B/month as a foreigner which is married to a local or 400,000B in an account to get a 1 year-visa without any further rights, than to show about 340,000B in an account plus a 27,000 Baht-income for the right to live, work and study include the right to take a foreign spouse and 1 kid as offered in the Phils for 50 years old and above?
Very impressive....lol
Show me where it's allowed in Thailand?

Of course, under 50 years old persons without any pension must show about 1,7m Baht for the same rights as mentioned above....Malaysia is even a little bit more expensive.
But as I said, that are just programs, which offers you additional options beside visa-runs or 2 months extensions (hope you get it now, mate! :roll: ).
I can't see anything like this in Thailand!
You even get more benefits under the mentioned Phil-Visa-program:
-driving liscence
-multiple entry privileges
-no income tax
-no annual registration requirements of Bureau of Immigrations...
etc.
http://www.pra.gov.ph/main/srrv_program2/2?page=1

I think you don't need to tell more about "kind Thailand"!
So let it be and give us the chance for a nice dinner & some drinks instead... :wink:
User avatar
Super Joe
Rock Star
Rock Star
Posts: 4929
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 1:43 pm

Post by Super Joe »

So, SJ, you really think it's more comfortable in TH to show 40,000B/month as a foreigner which is married to a local or 400,000B in an account to get a 1 year-visa without any further rights, than to show about 340,000B in an account plus a 27,000 Baht-income for the right to live, work and study include the right to take a foreign spouse and 1 kid as offered in the Phils for 50 years old and above?
What on earth are you talking about now ? You've just been caught out on the investment thing and now you are changing the subject to comparisons between Thai 'family support/marriage' visas and Philippine over 50 retirement visas, because the Philippines under 50 option we were discussing doesn't suit.
I haven't been making comparisons about between the two at all.
Of course, under 50 years old persons without any pension must show about 1,7m Baht for the same rights as mentioned above ... Malaysia is even a little bit more expensive.
YES that was the subject. The Philippine option at 50,000 USD's doesn't help the guy's struggling to get the 400k Baht together and Malaysia's 85,000 USD most certainly doesn't.
beside visa-runs or 2 months extensions (hope you get it)
Yes I think I'm there :roll: , let me know when you get that years of continuinely getting 2 month extensions on work or tourist visas is abusing the system, the same as the Thai border runners here did, and can be stopped over night and the family and kids uprooted. Not the advice I would give anyone but up to you.

Hopefully, that's it for us for everyone's sake.

SJ :cheers:
hogus
Professional
Professional
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 6:34 pm
Location: Hua Hin

Post by hogus »

Don't try to twist my words all the time!
I gave you already all answers about letting all your money invested in neighbor-countries, about the different benefits you'll get for your money if you want to apply for visa-programs and about the links to read and understand the facts hopefully!
As you should know, in Thailand you get nothing similar!

If someone can't apply for these additional programs, he should be able to do visa-runs and cheap extensions include the chance to apply for work-permits etc. in a separate way!

The best what TH had to offer in the past was this elite-card (without the right to work), where you can kiss your money "good bye", if you want to be out of program.
Great!

...and as you said, hopefully that was it for us for everyone's sake!
Totally agree!
:cheers:
User avatar
Super Joe
Rock Star
Rock Star
Posts: 4929
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 1:43 pm

Post by Super Joe »

hogus wrote:Don't try to twist my words all the time! I gave you already all answers about letting all your money invested in neighbor-countries, about the different benefits you'll get for your money
Twist your words!?!? First you said it doesn't say anywhere you have to leave your money in. Now you're giving the benefits of leaving it in.
I don't even know the twist.
include the chance to apply for work-permits in a separate way
By absailing down their chimney in a monkey suit ?

SJ
hogus
Professional
Professional
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 6:34 pm
Location: Hua Hin

Post by hogus »

Ah, come on SJ, don't start to be childish...I think you're smart enough to understand all written arguments above without the need to divorce them from theirs context!
Fact is that the mentioned neighbor-countries offers many different and even easy ways for foreigners to stay, live and work.

Our hypothetical guy, which is married to a Thai, lives in her country, has 2 kids and is not 50 years old yet, seems to be lost in the Hell of Thailand's restrictive regulations.
I can't see that hypothetical persons, which are married with a Khmer, a Filipina or a Malaysian girl and are living in the country of their beloved, have same problems!
As Buksi said already, "in most civilized countries immigrants generally get some form of permanent residency and human rights automatically after living, working, raising families and integrating into the country they have moved to for such a long period of time"

Seems Thailand has a problem with this!
However, hope I could do my part to come :offtopic: :wink:
User avatar
Super Joe
Rock Star
Rock Star
Posts: 4929
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 1:43 pm

Post by Super Joe »

Hogus,

No, it was just a daft attempt at humour to defuse and end our debate.

Cheers mate :cheers:


SJ
hogus
Professional
Professional
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 6:34 pm
Location: Hua Hin

Post by hogus »

Super Joe wrote:Hogus,
No, it was just a daft attempt at humour to defuse and end our debate.
Cheers mate :cheers:
SJ
I enjoy the British humor ....really! :mrgreen:
Cheers and have a nice night! ... until next time :wink:
:cheers:
User avatar
Super Joe
Rock Star
Rock Star
Posts: 4929
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 1:43 pm

Post by Super Joe »

lomuamart wrote:SJ,
I know we've had disagreements in the past about changes to visa exempt rules. Let me just ask you that if, under the present system, a person makes four consecutive 15 day visas exempt border runs and then flies to Cambodia and returns to Swampy to get another 30 day stamp and then does 4 consecutive 15 day runs - ad infinitum. Are they:

1. Doing anything illegal? - I'd say not really and do it myself if I had to. But under the law the Immigration Act has 'Tourism' under the catagory of a 'Temporary Stay', so that'd be a hard one to argue 10 years down the line.
2. Are they abusing the system? I'd say after the initial 4 no., if they repeated again and again the process then yes, particularly bearing in mind the law above
3. Are they embracing the new regulations? - Not after the initial 4 no., haven't really read it in full yet though.
4. Is this within the spirit of the law?- No due to the Immigration act.
Hi mate, my answers are based on the 'ad infinitum' part, rather than once or twice more times. Having said all that, I would do it all along with the others if I had no other choice.
Personally, I'd think it's 3 and positive to 4. The moot point might be the spirit of the law, but Thailand has changed the regulations three times recently and has had ample opportunity to do away with these people.
Could it be to do with not wanting to stuff up the ex-pats from Hong Kong, Singapore, China, Mid-East Oil etc who sometimes are working remotely have no chance to get to a consulate for tourist visas or whatever ?


I probably give the wrong impression on here, I am actually all for taking advantage of every loophole, providing it's legal. I don't sit and judge any of these people until they all start moaning about how much Thailand hates them and that they're off to Vietnam next week, cos they now have to show their 800k in the bank 3 months before renewal, so they can't borrow it off their mate like usual. I take responsibility for what I do and do not try to blame others.

None of this is aimed at you Lomu, you seem like me in that you just get on with enjoying your life and let whatever Thailand throws at us go over our heads. But I honestly believe from a lot of research that Thailand overall offers the cheapest and most wide-ranging visa options in the region (and I mean legit one's, not say a Philippine tourist visa that you get an agent to arrange an extension every 2 months forever). I'll put something up with comparisons in a thread, yawnnnnnnn.

Thailand has a visa option for everyone, providing you meet their modest financial requirements. The main gap if you like is the under 50's, with no family, no business, no employment etc. Thailand caters for them though with either:
a) A Non-Imm 'O' for just a 100 quid, yeah there's 4 border runs and a 15 monthly renewal run. Costs about 2,500 Baht a month to maintain.
b) The 'ED' Education visa which you can renew/run for 3 years - Costs about 3,000 Baht a month complete with 180 hours of Thai lessons included.
Yet you have people banging on about how much better the Philippines and Malaysia welcomes us under 50's, all we only have to invest 65,000 USD & 85,000 USD respectively to be allowed to join their programs.

Then you get the "Thailand only wants wealthy Farangs" brigade, errr so why haven't they increased the retirement income/show money by not even a single Baht for the past God knows how many years ? Thai annual retirement extension - 1,900 Baht, Philippines - 16,000 Baht

I work in property, how many law changes have messed my business up resulting in mega bungs to get round things, have I ever whinged on here once about the property laws, no. You take the rough with the smooth and consider myself lucky to be living here and certainly not arrogant enough to tell them how they should do things.

It's all these whingers who think Thailand is out to get them that bug me, the vast majority of the people who can not get the visa for the category they come under is down to them not having the funds or correct paperwork., 99% of the time I've seen. I know tons of them, my own mates included, people fall in love with Thailand and move out before they're ready too.

Sure Thailand changes the rules too often at too short notice, but a lot of that is down to Farang's, if it was my house and people were peeing on my front garden I'd try and f-k em up with hourly rule changes.
When a loophole gets plugged, in immigration, property, work permits, the FBA etc, it's more often than not due to foreigners abusing the loopholes. But we're too arrogant to 'collectively' assume any of the responsibility. We rant and rave instead, like the Farang's crying away when they got done for a few hundred Baht due to corruption, but at the same time taking advantage of it when it suits.

Bet you're glad you asked now Lomu LOL.
Apologies all :rant:

SJ
sargeant
Deceased
Deceased
Posts: 4055
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:52 pm
Location: Pranburi CITY

Post by sargeant »

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:32 am Post subject: Retirement visas in context

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have literally just watched FOX news and they announced that there is a lobby going on to change FOREIGN retirees visa requirements.
At present a foreign retiree can stay for 6 six months and then must leave the country for 2 two months.
They propose to introduce legislation for a SILVER card where retirees will have to show they have the income and health insurance plus background checks.

Is this the xenophobic Thailand

Nooooooooooooo

It is the United States of America

Please note the visa whingers 6 SIX months ONLY that puts it in context I would say
A Greatfull Guest of Thailand
User avatar
Name Taken
Suspended
Suspended
Posts: 1025
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 1:57 pm

Post by Name Taken »

sargeant wrote:Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:32 am Post subject: Retirement visas in context

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have literally just watched FOX news and they announced that there is a lobby going on to change FOREIGN retirees visa requirements.
At present a foreign retiree can stay for 6 six months and then must leave the country for 2 two months.
They propose to introduce legislation for a SILVER card where retirees will have to show they have the income and health insurance plus background checks.

Is this the xenophobic Thailand

Nooooooooooooo

It is the United States of America

Please note the visa whingers 6 SIX months ONLY that puts it in context I would say
The United States of America is more xenophobic than Thailand?
LOL that's funny

No, The United States of America is a much more ethnically and culturally diverse country than Thailand is.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiculturalism

In 2006, a total of 1,266,264 immigrants became legal permanent residents of the United States, up from 601,516 in 1987, 849,807 in 2000, and 1,122,373 in 2005. The top twelve sending countries in 2006, by country of birth, were Mexico (173,753), People's Republic of China (87,345), Philippines (74,607), India (61,369), Cuba (45,614), Colombia (43,151), Dominican Republic (38,069), El Salvador (31,783), Vietnam (30,695), Jamaica (24,976), South Korea (24,386), Guatemala (24,146), Other countries - 606,370 - and those numbers do not even include the millions of illegal immigrants that are a living and working in the United States of America.
sargeant
Deceased
Deceased
Posts: 4055
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:52 pm
Location: Pranburi CITY

Post by sargeant »

NT a couple of points
1... i did not say the USA was more xenophobic
2... Posters on virtually all Thai visa threads call Thailand xenophobic
3... To foreign retirees trying to stay in the USA they have a far more difficult time staying there than they do in Thailand
4... I was merely making the point it doesnt matter where one goes in this world the countries make their own rules and it is always a pain and does not necessarily make sense
5... As SJ says jump the jumps go through the hoops and be happy that rules here can be very flexible
6... Dont expect sympathy if you cannot make the requirements move on

or as Buksi answered my post query on not meeting the retirement figure of 800,000 due to pounds devaluation this year close the door on my way out
A Greatfull Guest of Thailand
User avatar
Super Joe
Rock Star
Rock Star
Posts: 4929
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 1:43 pm

Post by Super Joe »

On the subject of Thailand's clamping down on Foreign 'border runners':
Many here say Thailand is draconian and anti-foreigner with it's immigration laws compared to it's neighbouring countries. Cambodia has been mentioned as an alternative, I posted on here ages back that Cambodia's equivalent 'border runners', those looking for long stays but can not meet Cambodia's visa category criteria obtain these easily dished out Business/Working 'E' Visas (which are then intended for you to find employment and obtain WP's.) Instead they have just been renewing them yearly I think.
This is their best option as CAMBODIA DOES NOT OFFER ANYWHERE CLOSE TO THE EXTENSIVE RANGE OF VISA CATEGORIES THAT OUR BELOVED THAILAND DOES. They found their loophole and good luck to them, they'll be safe though as it's only Thailand that does not want those types and is clamping down on them in favour of the wealthy foreigners.

Let's have a look at how they're getting along ........
Cambodian Immigration Law Mess May Affect Thousands of Foreigners:
According to Cambodia's Immigration Law, all foreigners working in Cambodia are potentially doing so illegally. The problem is that Cambodian immigration law is a web of often contradictory regulations, which leaves enforcement up to the individual discretion of officials.
Many regulations have been issued in an attempt to clarify procedures since the Immigration Law was passed because the law is minimal in detail. When those are not detailed enough "we think about it and try to work out something that works." said the Director of the Department of Foreigners at the Ministry of Interior.

The comparison between Business visas and work permits issued shows the percentage of foreigners working or living in Cambodia illegally is much higher, officials caution that just paying for a Business visa doesn’t indicate that a foreigner is actually employed, the issuing of a business visa only allows foreigners to apply for employment and a work permit, said Kirth Chantharith.

The Ministry of the Interior, said 69,640 business visas were issued in 2003 alone but that only 5,727 work permits were issued He said he was waiting for the results of a Interior Ministry census on how many foreigners are working or living in the country illegally.

Immigration Law Penalties:
-Repeat breaches of this Immigration Law by one individual shall be punished by one month to three months imprisonment.
-The Minister of Interior shall order every immigrant alien who violates the provisions of this Law expelled from the Kingdom of Cambodia.


SJ
lomuamart
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 9822
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 12:25 pm
Location: hua hin

Post by lomuamart »

SJ,
That's a lot to digest at this time of night.
I'll try to reply to your points tomorrow. Chok dii.
User avatar
buksida
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 24128
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 12:25 pm
Location: south of sanity

Post by buksida »

I just love those rose tinted ones that a minority (and a very small one) are wearing on this forum.

Nice comparison SJ, Cambodia ... a country fresh out of genocide compared to one that has enjoyed foreign revenue for the past 40 years - next you'll be saying that Thailand is great because the Burmese won't let us stay there unless we swim across a lake and declare our allegiance to the Junta.

Seriously though, anyone that has lived in Thailand for any length of time (and has a clue) will attest to that fact that not once have the immigration or foreign affairs department (since the Chuan administration) ever made anything easier or lightened up on permanent residents (serial non-immigrant visa holders). Neighbouring countries are slowly coming around and relaxing their policies while this one continues to tighten up (largely due to greed from that 40 year stint).

I'd imagine that its easier to get some form of recognition and human rights in Colombia, but then it is part of the American sub-continent, and Thailand can do everything themselves and doesn't need us pesky foreigners ... right?
Who is the happier man, he who has braved the storm of life and lived or he who has stayed securely on shore and merely existed? - Hunter S Thompson
Post Reply