If the canary is singing doesn't that mean everything is fine?
I'm no miner but I reckon a singing canary is a good thing, a dead canary might indicate trouble (or that Sylvester the Cat is also working down the mines)
"The average temperature for the contiguous U.S. during July was 77.6°F, 3.3°F above the 20th century average, marking the hottest July and the hottest month on record for the nation. The previous warmest July for the nation was July 1936 when the average U.S. temperature was 77.4°F. The warm July temperatures contributed to a record-warm first seven months of the year and the warmest 12-month period the nation has experienced since recordkeeping began in 1895."
Arcadian wrote:I`ve got a bag for life, will I go to heaven?
Hey, Mrs BB brought hers from England with her, and actually confuses the hell out of people here when she uses it. I think we'll go to double heaven
Big Boy, we are a fine example to all of those Chinese industrial polluters, if they read our posts it would shame them into mending their ways. Or not.
"What you're seeing is more open ocean than you're seeing ice," he said. "It just simply doesn't look like what a polar scientist expects the arctic to look like. It's wide open and the (ice) cap is very small. It's a visceral thing. You look at it and that just doesn't look like the Arctic Ocean any more."
"The sea ice in the Arctic Ocean has melted to its smallest point ever in a milestone that may show that worst-case forecasts on climate change are coming true, US scientists said.
The extent of ice observed on Sunday broke a record set in 2007 and will likely melt further with several weeks of summer still to come, according to data from the National Snow and Ice Data Center and the NASA space agency."
Frank Hovis wrote:Does that mean the maximum increase in sea level from now until it's all melted is 40% of what has been recorded since 1970 uptil now?
No, arctic sea ice is floating so it doesn't increase the sea level, that comes from ice sitting on land in such places as Antarctica and Greenland.
So the amount of ice covering the Arctic ocean has no bearing on sea levels, only the ice on Greenland (and other arctic land above sea level) is an issue as it would run into the sea, while the sea ice is already in the sea - is that right?
Do you have a similar graph for % of non-sea ice that has melted since the 70s?