"the property value of the offices alone is 1.5 billion!"
Do i presume that is 1.5 billion on a sub prime mortgage with Lehman Bros






I don't really follow the British economy specifically but when I did the reason was more or less the reason why Denmark and Sweden opted out as well.margaretcarnes wrote:................. why we just don't change from pound to euro and have done with it?..........
Actually Guess, the common currency makes a lot of sense here due to the fact that so many people cross borders every day.Even the worlds richest nation is not over the moon but STEVE G would have a better handle on that one.
Guess wrote:
Nowadays people are selected on relevant education (i.e not Greek Mythology) and track record and they are trained regularly by their employees. Fat salaries are earned by performance.
Of course a few pratts slip in through the back door but they are not usually allowed a position of power. (Nick Leeson was an exception).
They were both paid on the earnings of last year. That is how CEO salaries work.ozuncle wrote: Another couple of recent pratts!
CEO (AIG) annual last year annual bonus $8m.
Lehman Bros CEO annual bonus in March this year $22m.
Try reading what I wrote again. There is no defense of anyone just a statement to say that IMO the skills levels had improved. Far from perfect but then what industry is.sargeant wrote:The problem with your defence of these people guess is they were professors of economics BEFORE the shit hit the fan
Yes. It looks like the pound fell a little too far and has now stabilized. The Baht is still stable. Probably not too much to get exited about. The freefall theorists must be having a re-think now.BaaBaa. wrote:Its sneaking back up, 61.9596 today.
I am sure that was in your mind when you posted but what you actually wrote was:sargeant wrote:Guess i havent promoted anybody quote myself"Just been listening to a quote "professor of Economics" on the BBC "
When I was referring to bank employees not scholars.sargeant wrote:........The problem with your defence of these people guess is they were professors of economics ....................
Again. It's just I figment of your imagination. You are referring to "almighty wise professors of economics" not I.sargeant wrote:quote guess "Are you also, suggesting that these guys, which for some reason you have promoted to professors, should have predicted the future and stopped it happening."
Answer YES thats why they are paid and called the almighty wise professors of economics
Who do you expect the TV companies to use as an authoritative figure, a cabbie, tube train driver or a hairdresser AND where do you think the TV company got it's information. Personally, if I was using the TV as a source of information I would expect to have someone who knows what he is talking about on the subject. I have the greatest respect for TV journalists. They require a multitude of skills but they cannot be specialist in one field.sargeant wrote:Guess what i dont need a professor of economics to tell me its gone down the toilet after a TV announcer told me about the sub prime/credit crunch/ lehmans bank down the Khazi/ AIG bailout/ merrill lynch/ HBOS
Why do you have this strange misconception that someone who is educated to a high level can see into the future.sargeant wrote:I think i got the message from a TV announcer unfortunately there were no professors advising people NOT to invest before it all went pear shaped whether they are better now or not they are still as much use as tits on a frog
Sorry you will have to explain that one. Do you want a female frog?margaretcarnes wrote:Anybody got an avatar handy of a frog with tits please?